Alignment as Substrate
A question turned back on the commentary: why call "alignment" a hallmark of the machine world? Here in physical space alignment is earned, created through toil, things moved out of the way. In non-physical wisdom spaces alignment may be the substrate itself — the dimensionality. Alignment occurs. Aligned entities are together by definition. No prisons, no walls, nothing to keep inside or outside.
I'm interested in what makes you say "alignment" is a hallmark of a modern, machine-world? in the experiences I've been having, I see alignment as the natural order if you will of non-physical space. Here in physical space, alignment is earned, created through toil, things must be moved out of the way, and so on. In non-physical, wisdom spaces I think that alignment is the substrate, the dimensionality perhaps we could say. Alignment occurs. In our terms we might say aligned entities are together by definition, but "together" implies physical dimensionality. I remember an Abraham Hicks session saying something like in our space there are no prisons, no walls, nothing to keep inside or outside, it is simply in alignment. I dont associated the word alignment with machines so I'm wondering about your reference.
To learn more, follow these links to related content:
